BOOK VII. TWO TEMPTATIONS.
66. CHAPTER LXVI.
 
  "'Tis one thing to be tempted, Escalus,
    Another thing to fall."
                        --Measure for Measure.
Lydgate certainly had good reason to reflect on the service
 his practice did him in counteracting his personal cares. 
 He had no longer free energy enough for spontaneous research and
 speculative thinking, but by the bedside of patients, the direct
 external calls on his judgment and sympathies brought the added
 impulse needed to draw him out of himself.  It was not simply
 that beneficent harness of routine which enables silly men to live
 respectably and unhappy men to live calmly--it was a perpetual
 claim on the immediate fresh application of thought, and on the
 consideration of another's need and trial.  Many of us looking back
 through life would say that the kindest man we have ever known
 has been a medical man, or perhaps that surgeon whose fine tact,
 directed by deeply informed perception, has come to us in our need
 with a more sublime beneficence than that of miracle-workers. Some
 of that twice-blessed mercy was always with Lydgate in his work at the
 Hospital or in private houses, serving better than any opiate to quiet
 and sustain him under his anxieties and his sense of mental degeneracy. 
Mr. Farebrother's suspicion as to the opiate was true, however. 
 Under the first galling pressure of foreseen difficulties,
 and the first perception that his marriage, if it were not to be
 a yoked loneliness, must be a state of effort to go on loving
 without too much care about being loved, he had once or twice
 tried a dose of opium.  But he had no hereditary constitutional
 craving after such transient escapes from the hauntings of misery. 
 He was strong, could drink a great deal of wine, but did not care
 about it; and when the men round him were drinking spirits, he took
 sugar and water, having a contemptuous pity even for the earliest
 stages of excitement from drink.  It was the same with gambling. 
 He had looked on at a great deal of gambling in Paris, watching it
 as if it had been a disease.  He was no more tempted by such winning
 than he was by drink.  He had said to himself that the only winning
 he cared for must be attained by a conscious process of high,
 difficult combination tending towards a beneficent result. 
 The power he longed for could not be represented by agitated fingers
 clutching a heap of coin, or by the half-barbarous, half-idiotic
 triumph in the eyes of a man who sweeps within his arms the ventures
 of twenty chapfallen companions. 
 |