PART 6
Chapter 11
 (continued)
Malthus was a well-known capitalist, who had made his money by
 speculation in railway shares.  Stepan Arkadyevitch described
 what grouse moors this Malthus had bought in the Tver province,
 and how they were preserved, and of the carriages and dogcarts in
 which the shooting party had been driven, and the luncheon
 pavilion that had been rigged up at the marsh. 
"I don't understand you," said Levin, sitting up in the hay; "how
 is it such people don't disgust you?  I can understand a lunch
 with Lafitte is all very pleasant, but don't you dislike just
 that very sumptuousness?  All these people, just like our spirit
 monopolists in old days, get their money in a way that gains them
 the contempt of everyone.  They don't care for their contempt,
 and then they use their dishonest gains to buy off the contempt
 they have deserved." 
"Perfectly true!" chimed in Vassenka Veslovsky.  "Perfectly!
 Oblonsky, of course, goes out of bonhomie, but other people say:
 'Well, Oblonsky stays with them.'..." 
"Not a bit of it." Levin could hear that Oblonsky was smiling as
 he spoke.  "I simply don't consider him more dishonest than any
 other wealthy merchant or nobleman.  They've all made their money
 alike--by their work and their intelligence." 
"Oh, by what work?  Do you call it work to get hold of
 concessions and speculate with them?" 
"Of course it's work.  Work in this sense, that if it were not
 for him and others like him, there would have been no railways." 
"But that's not work, like the work of a peasant or a learned
 profession." 
"Granted, but it's work in the sense that his activity produces a
 result--the railways.  But of course you think the railways
 useless." 
"No, that's another question; I am prepared to admit that
 they're useful.  But all profit that is out of proportion to the
 labor expended is dishonest." 
"But who is to define what is proportionate?" 
 |