| BOOK FIRST.
CHAPTER 3. MONSIEUR THE CARDINAL.
 Poor Gringoire! the din of all the great double petards of
 the Saint-Jean, the discharge of twenty arquebuses on
 supports, the detonation of that famous serpentine of the Tower
 of Billy, which, during the siege of Paris, on Sunday, the
 twenty-sixth of September, 1465, killed seven Burgundians at
 one blow, the explosion of all the powder stored at the gate
 of the Temple, would have rent his ears less rudely at that
 solemn and dramatic moment, than these few words, which
 fell from the lips of the usher, "His eminence, Monseigneur
 the Cardinal de Bourbon." It is not that Pierre Gringoire either feared or disdained
 monsieur the cardinal.  He had neither the weakness nor the
 audacity for that.  A true eclectic, as it would be expressed
 nowadays, Gringoire was one of those firm and lofty, moderate
 and calm spirits, which always know how to bear themselves
 amid all circumstances (stare in dimidio rerum), and who
 are full of reason and of liberal philosophy, while still setting
 store by cardinals.  A rare, precious, and never interrupted
 race of philosophers to whom wisdom, like another
 Ariadne, seems to have given a clew of thread which they
 have been walking along unwinding since the beginning of
 the world, through the labyrinth of human affairs.  One finds
 them in all ages, ever the same; that is to say, always according
 to all times.  And, without reckoning our Pierre Gringoire,
 who may represent them in the fifteenth century if we
 succeed in bestowing upon him the distinction which he
 deserves, it certainly was their spirit which animated Father
 du Breul, when he wrote, in the sixteenth, these naively sublime
 words, worthy of all centuries: "I am a Parisian by
 nation, and a Parrhisian in language, for parrhisia in Greek
 signifies liberty of speech; of which I have made use even
 towards messeigneurs the cardinals, uncle and brother to
 Monsieur the Prince de Conty, always with respect to their
 greatness, and without offending any one of their suite, which
 is much to say." There was then neither hatred for the cardinal, nor disdain
 for his presence, in the disagreeable impression produced
 upon Pierre Gringoire.  Quite the contrary; our poet had
 too much good sense and too threadbare a coat, not to
 attach particular importance to having the numerous allusions
 in his prologue, and, in particular, the glorification of the
 dauphin, son of the Lion of France, fall upon the most eminent
 ear.  But it is not interest which predominates in the noble
 nature of poets.  I suppose that the entity of the poet may
 be represented by the number ten; it is certain that a chemist
 on analyzing and pharmacopolizing it, as Rabelais says, would
 find it composed of one part interest to nine parts of
 self-esteem. |